See Bill - http://www.scribd.com/doc/35768034/GABRIELA-PARTY-LIST-S-HB-1799-Divorce-Bill
Like any other bill that supposed to pass like Rizal Bill - See Post below on this Page "The Shameful Whore in The Philippines, The Catholic Church.."
And RH bill Philippines that was being opposed and bigoted by those indoctrinated representatives not on behalf of their representing but their Church to whom they represent, just because it contradicts to this ridiculous doctrines and teachings of this church..
With all the deliberation and justification of the said bill and majority of the people are supporting it, Still they wont allow the people to have the benefits of it..
See bill - http://bistado.com/news/information/complete-reproductive-health-bill-text-house-bill-4244/
Amended - http://senatorpiacayetano.com/?p=1348
They force the people whose not even in their religion to bound to this Church.. Because of the Church's policy and influence in legislative that force in every citizens in this country.. With this kind of filthy doctrines which only deal with death that will separate the Married..
"The marriage annulments are closely associated with the Roman Catholic Church, which teaches marriage is a lifelong commitment and cannot be dissolved through divorce, but can be annulled if invalidly entered into.." See source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annulment
"The Roman Catholic Church remained opposed to divorce, a Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines official declared Thursday as he reminded married couples that marriage was a life-long commitment." Source - http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/200061/church-remains-against-divorce%E2%80%94cbcp
“We should protect the sanctity of marriage, as marriage is a life-long commitment. Any marital problem cannot be solved by divorce. What will solve it is finding the root cause of the problem,” Castro told reporters. - Source -http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/200061/church-remains-against-divorce%E2%80%94cbcp
-They say they should protect the sanctity of the marriage, even the couples in their heart are no longer
faithful to each others and their conscience tells them that its better to be apart and separate and wish to separate for the better of their futures without or with another spouse rather to stay together and live in a lie relationship that may cause a lot problem to them and their children,. They say they should remain together until someone die. This kind of policy endangered the life of a married that might end up in crimes. This is tyranny on the part of this whose in position who's not allowing these people to have their rights to choose.. The sanctity here is the conscience of these individuals to have the right to choose for themselves for the better life, and the morality here is not forcing them to maintain their situation in a complicated life.. These are blind politicians in the legislative finding the root of the problem if the problem is the marriage itself. The marriage are sacred and their conscience, will and their hearts that made them a couple that sacred their marriage and not anybody so they have the rights to choose and no one can take that from them when it comes to their decisions, and that makes their personal decision a sacred. They saying this kind of things just because of having stable relationship with their couples in their part not realizing and, not placing themselves in the situation of those couples whose life are in jeopardy living together.. They don't understand this kind of circumstances.. They acting like holy persons who know not but their situation whose relationship with their spouse are stable.. Who needs a divorce if your relationship are stable.. And those sick Priests who are not allowed to marry saying this kind of things?.. They shackle this people..
These politicians should become a religious leader and preach instead, rather of having them in the legislative and make their doctrines in to a law that everyone must obligate to follow.. They paralyzed this Country because of their false faith that force to everyone.. They trying to play a saint by maintaining this kind of ignorance that everyone must see that they are called morality but the truth its nothing but hypocrisy.. They burden this people and showing to the world how this country is dictated by this arrogant Church.. This Country is a joke because of them..
PHILIPPINES CONSTITUTION:
ARTICLE XIII
SOCIAL JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1. The Congress shall give highest priority to the enactment of measures that protect and enhance the right of all the people to human dignity, reduce social, economic, and political inequalities, and remove cultural inequities by equitably diffusing wealth and political power for the common good. Source - Philippine_Constitution
We are not only dealing with this so called values of them (This one particular Church- RCC) and culture that always been alibi by Catholics (A culture that was being force to us to embrace for 300 years by those who invaded us..) and some so called Christian Denominations that always avail just for their own purposes, But were dealing of different cultures and not just one believe, and the needs of all the people here in this Nation.. This Bill is not new in our land -
"Historically, divorce had been part of our legal system. In the beginning of the 16th century, before the Spanish colonial rule, absolute divorce waswidely practiced among ancestral tribes such as the Tagbanwas of Palawan,the Gadangs of Nueva Vizcaya, the Sagadans and Igorots of the Cordilleras,and the Manobos, B’laans and Moslems of the Visayas and Mindanao islands.Divorce was also available during the American period, starting from 1917(under Act No. 2710 enacted by the Philippine Legislature), and during the Japanese occupation (under Executive Order No. 141) and after, until 1950. Itwas only on August 30, 1950, when the New Civil Code took effect, thatdivorce was disallowed under Philippine law. Only legal separation wasavailable. The same rule was adopted by the Family Code of 1988, whichreplaced the provisions of the New Civil Code on marriage and the family,although the Family Code introduced the concept of "psychologicalincapacity” as a basis for declaring the marriage void" Source - http://www.scribd.com/doc/35768034/GABRIELA-PARTY-LIST-S-HB-1799-Divorce-Bill
This kind of hypocrisy hides the reality of whats really happening between the married couples that jeopardized their lives. And also hides the reality of most of people here are ending up in separation. They don't want a formal total separation but instead still bounding those persons in a lie, complicated annulment law (adultery bill).. This lies of Church calling themselves advocate of morality must realize the reality that people whose not in their religion are not bound on such filthy doctrines. If they believe what they believe then why force it to others... They just making fool out of this people..
("Because Filipinos are primarily a Catholic country and divorce is not allowed by the Church that is why families are regarded with so much love and care in the Philippines.." source-http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080714055400AAG3K7e ) Note: Divorce is not allowed by the Church..
The Constitution of the Philippines :
"The Separation of Church and State shall be " inviolable" (Not capable of being broken or violated) .-Art II. Section 6, 1987 Constitution No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of political rights.-Art. III, Section 5, 1987 Constitution Religious denominations and sects shall not be
registered (as a political party,organization or coalition, by the Comelec)-Art. IX, C, Section 2(5)One-half of the seats allocated to the party-list representatives shall be filled, as provided by law, by selection or election from labor, peasant, urban poor,indigenous cultural communities, women, youth, and such other sectors as may be provided by law, except the religious sector.-Art. VI, sec. 5(2)." - Source - Philippine Constitution (Present Constitution)
1973 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines - Section 8. No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.
Title IIIRELIGION Article 5. The State recognizes the freedom and equality of all religions, as well as the separation of the Church and the State. - 1899 Constitution
Title III RELIGION Article 5. The State recognizes the freedom and equality of all religions, as well as the
separation of the Church and the State. - Malolos Constituition
-The family code of the Philippines does not forbid divorce, It is just not mentioned and not prioritize the literal word divorce, it just need to be amend.. In the family code all the reason to pass the bill (divorce) are in the articles.. They knew time will come that this bill will be debated and this country should have Divorce.. The term legal Separation is Divorce..
"In recognition of the history of divorce in the Philippines, the framers of the 1987 Philippine Constitution left the wisdom of legalizing divorce to the Congress. Thus, the 1987 Constitution does not prohibit the legalization of divorce." Source- http://www.scribd.com/doc/35768034/GABRIELA-PARTY-LIST-S-HB-1799-Divorce-Bill
These so called morality of these church that are being used by these congressman and senators and all these holy pretender religious people here in the Philippines that holding this bill to do not pass it are just only lies
and hypocrisy.. They always alibi the scriptures but they did not understand because they always follow what had been told to them by their priests whose not even know the hole scriptures.. To all lawyers and law makers in the Philippines, Let these be a clarification to pass the important bill and to justify the said bill that this country should have, and the rights of all women to go and marry another man and the rights of man to marry another woman with no complicated separation and no legal lies involved (Annulment Law)-
"annulment is proving that the marriage wasn't real or legal due to different factors therefore making the marriage non-existent or invalid."
Source- http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080714055400AAG3K7e
“In annulment, the marriage of the parties is declared defective from the beginning, albeit it's considered valid until annulled. The defect can be used to nullify the marriage within a specified period but the same may be ignored and the marriage becomes perfectly valid after the lapse of that period, or the defect may be cured through some act. The defect relates to the time of the celebration of the marriage and has nothing to do with circumstances occurring after the marriage is celebrated. In annulment, the marriage is legally canceled, and the man and woman are restored to their singles status.”
Source - http://attyatwork.com/house-bill-1699-proposing-divorce-in-the-philippines/
This Annulment Law complicates and burden the people in this country.. They legalizes lies ..-
“I’ll tell you why. I’ve talked to lawyers, psychologists and psychiatrists and it’s so traumatic to go through annulment because under our Philippine laws, you have to blame someone, you have to say you’re incapacitated, you’re saying that this marriage never existed, which is not true,” she said.
“Ask anyone, I’m sure at some point in time whether it’s one year or 10 years or 20 years, they loved each other, so why can’t you call it what it is? We loved each other, something went wrong, it’s done. Why will you say it never existed?” she asked. - a Senator speaking..
Source- http://globalbalita.com/2012/05/29/philippines-needs-divorce-law/
"The problem with annulment of voidable marriage and declaration of nullity of marriage is that most of the grounds are difficult to prove and require a lot of money to prove before the court. Only the rich can and have actually availed of its benefits, that’s why it’s not unusual to read about movie and TV celebrities and businessmen filing for annulment of marriage, and why only 8,000 annulments have been issued so far. And worse, it is the aggrieved party who must shoulder the exorbitant costs."
Source- http://globalbalita.com/2012/05/29/philippines-needs-divorce-law/
This is not a evangelical page or a pastor of scripture but let this be a clarification to the false teachings that was force to every people here in this country that for decades that are being fooled to this land and to justified the said important bill (Divorce Bill).. These scriptures are what they stand for, and their reason to do not pass the said bill (Divorce Bill) but what does the Church stand when it comes to the scripture?
The forcing these kind of belief to the people that bonds them by the use of the source that they despised and despite.. Now what are the scriptures that they are trying to use to bond the people, What does the scripture said? - The Answer follows
1 Corinthians 7:10-11 KJV "10 And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:
11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife."
-No man should separate them for they are faithful to each other..
Matthew 19:6 KJV "Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."
-But if they (The married couple) decided and choose to separate to each other for reasons, then let no man stop them..
Rom. 7:2–3 KJV "For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband."
-A married woman is bound by law to her husband as long as he lives, but if they are legally separated she is not bound anymore..
1 Corinthians 7:15 KJV "But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace."
-Don't bound the unbeliever is such believe that she or he does not even believe that may cause unpeacefull end..
Matthew 19:8 KJV "He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so."
-God never gave man heart that will kill( not literal) his wife because of unfaithful relationship or any other reasons..
Mark 10:11-12 KJV
11 And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.
Mark 5:31 KJV "It has been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:"
-The words "put away" and "divorcement" are placed in one sentence, it means they are opposite and not the same.. How can these words are the same if they are used to separate a subject.. How can Christ said that if he put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her, and commanded Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement..
For more clarification - "Jesus did not say that whosoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery. What He did say was that whosoever marries a woman that has been separated from her husband without a legal bill of divorcement commits adultery; because she is still legally and officially married to her estranged husband." source http://www.lifetv.org/Web_HTML/html/Commentary%20folder/Divorce.htm
-"The phrase “putting away” is not the Hebrew word “keriythuwth” (divorce) but rather it is translated from the Hebrew word that represents the second component of a Biblical divorce, “shalach” (to put out, to send away). The King James Bible correctly translated the Hebrew passage with the words, God hates “the putting away” of a wife.." -see source- http://www.lifetv.org/Web_HTML/html/Commentary%20folder/Divorce.htm
Deuteronomy 24 KJV "When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house."
-God considered and allowed divorce
John 3:18 KJV
"18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."
Deuteronomy 24:22 KJV "And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt: therefore I command thee to do this thing."
Note: King James Version is the scripture that only translated word for word and preserved during the time of persecution by the Catholic Church of this Book (The Bible) and burn all of it and replaced it with their own version (Catholic Version) that leads to many misinterpreted versions of this scriptures....
Revelation 22- KJV
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
The doctrines of the church is a plague in this country..
Is the Church (RCC) Using God's Law or their own made doctrines (Invented Religious Law).. Its unbiblical..
This fascists (Priest, Bishops, Nuns, Pope) of this church and their dominion inside the Government and other religious leaders always advocating about morality.. But they are the poison to the society..
-Matthew 23:25-33 King James Version (KJV)
25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.
26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.
27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.
28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
Bishop accused of diverting millions - http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/7201-church-fund-misuse-to-be-probed-by-rome
Facing the Senate on the alleged use of public funds to benefit some members of the Church, the bishops announced they were returning the vehicles, some of which were parked on the Senate grounds.- http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/1419-calling-on-the-suv-bishops#.T0TK1gOykyE.facebook
Priest charged with adultery, unjust vexation-"ANGELES CITY, Philippines – A mall executive has filed adultery and unjust vexation charges on Friday against a newly ordained priest, whom he accused of having an illicit affair with his wife." - http://www.philstar.com/nation/article.aspx?publicationsubcategoryid=67&articleid=737761
A ROMAN Catholic Filipino priest, who is believed to be hiding in the Philippines after being accused of possessing child pornography and stealing from his parish in Worcester, Massachusetts, has been officially indicted on those charges, according to the Worcester Telegram. - http://www.asianjournal.com/fil-am-news/3-filamnews/15337-pinoy-priest-indicted-on-child-porn-charges.html
Msgr. Achilles Dakay, the archdiocese’s media liaison officer, said Garcia’s suspension came months before the priest was implicated by a National Geographic article in illegal trade of ivory in the Philippines.- http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/277960/priest-suspended-on-20-year-old-child-abuse-raps
Dakay said Garcia was suspended by Cebu Archbishop Jose Palma in June on instructions of the Vatican because of the ongoing investigation of the child abuse case filed against him.- http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/277960/priest-suspended-on-20-year-old-child-abuse-raps
"They washed their hands of him," said the other former altar boy with whom Monsignor Garcia admits having had sexual contact. "It's as if no one wants to face what happened." - Source - http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2005_03_16_Egerton_PriestAccused.htm
"The parish priest of St Anne in Tubay town, Father Raul Cabonce, is facing charges of two counts of rape, child abuse and acts of lasciviousness, filed last Thursday at the provincial prosecutor’s office." - http://www.ucanews.com/2011/08/30/diocese-looks-into-priests-rape-charge/
"Revealed: publisher owned by the Catholic Church sells pornography" - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/revealed-publisher-owned-by-the-catholic-church-sells-pornography-6257572.html
History of the Church is a full of abomination..
It is over used pathetic reasons ( Catholic Values)l to say that we must follow this kind of believe even most of the catholic people don't even follow them, and those people whose not even in their religion.. And even it contradicts its main source that they always alibi.. Were they not understand what they read and force it upon the people..
It is over reacting, over dramatic of them that saying that divorce destroys family, How can it be destroy when its already destroyed.. Traumatized children, Why blame divorce if the children was traumatized caused by never ending fighting of a couple who wants to be separated to each other.. Psychologically, it will heal these people after divorce.. They trying to put a fear in the mind of all people by meaningless and unreasonable that they can throw just to say that this bill is what it is to what they are trying to portrait by these who oppose it.. Many couples here are separated and have their new life with another spouse with no of these kind of psychological traumatized etch. thing, in fact the separation heals them. It just need their separation to be legalized with no lies involved (Annulment). They (The people who opposed it) living in a delusion like in a fairy land and They can't face the reality of most people here are needs to be formally legally separated before of having another spouse and continue their life and move on and live happily ever after..
They just creating fear into the hearts of men and women that condemns them (This People).. While their doing their (Church leaders and Religious leaders) unjust ways.. The only thing that they are doing to this people is creating a drugs to do not fear of dying and not having a life.. It doesn't matter if they die as long as the Church controls them even those whose not in their religion..
Other religion in this country have its own divorce law because of having no divorce bill here-
"Philippine law through the Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 1083 [1977]) allows divorce among Filipino Muslims, in deference to the Islamic faith which recognizes divorce. Non-Muslim Filipinos should've the same option under Philippine law, in accordance with their religious beliefs.". - Source - http://www.scribd.com/doc/35768034/GABRIELA-PARTY-LIST-S-HB-1799-Divorce-Bill
Why not pass Divorce and let others have the benefits of it..
Our Constitution does recognize the equality of all religion..It shows what kind of religion this Church is, nothing but despotism in this land. And many people here ending in a separation and having another partner without formal separation. Still this people needs a legal documentation of their separation under Republic Act (Divorce Bill). Instead of going to another country just to file a divorce, why not here. And only foreign spouses can file a divorce and not our local countrymen, it shows how this kind of maltreatment treats are local people in a slave form of situation. Making Filipino people dumb and low class being or species that are not fully develop their humanity. They shackle this people.. . Their are against the liberty of the people -
Philippines Constitution:
BILL OF RIGHTS
Section 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.
Section 11. The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights..
Section 14. The State recognizes the role of women in nation-building, and shall ensure the fundamental equality before the law of women and men.
They cannot manage their own ethics without interfering in the legislative, it shows how poor immoral they are. If their members don't want a divorce then let others have the benefits of it.. Their are not forcing to this bill (Divorce) and force to this bill, if this bill will be passed.. If they say that their values are good, then while go to attorney and file a divorce. That's their choice, live in a complicated annulment form of separation and live together with their wife and husband in hell until someone die in their part to get free, but don't let others be on the same situation inside this religion.. Whats a Democracy without divorce.. Let the People choose.. This kind of religion will always seek for a civil authority for all to the people be obligated to their own religious law.. This country is not a Theocracy..
Are all people are bound to this Church? It is not a problem of a person who do not believe in their doctrines to follow it and bound him or herself unto it.. Even the bible contradicts their filthy doctrines (RCC doctrines). What about those Unbelievers? or other religion who believe in divorce? and majority of the people in this Country are favoring divorce. Majority or Minority of people living in this country are equal when it comes of giving their rights reasonable and responsible. Are these people are bound and obligated to the rules of this Church (RCC)? If they say that the basis of their doctrines is the bible then what they are doing in their church.. Again this question needs to be answered by this persons who's in placed and all people who against the right of men and women of having this benefits, Are all people here in this Republic are obligate and must follow your religious doctrines? Are all people here must be under the Church law?
You only giving them two options in this Republic, and that is to follow your own unjust rules which is Unconstitutional that caused animosity and may lead to hostility, and Freedom to be free from this kind of intolerant arrogant rules which does not recognize by our Constitution and have their rights of all the people as a full citizens in this Nation..
It is hard to pass a law that people will benefits but it is easy to pass one when it comes of protecting someones ass mostly whose in position and some religious domain even it is not debated and deliberated, And passed it not knowing by the people..
September 12, 2012. a Law was passed:
Republic Act 10175 or known as Cyber Crime Law
Supported by the Church
This Law is idea of what was being proposed by US and Vatican Attempting to Censor Internet..
But what the Constitution said:
(Present Constitution)
THE 1987 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
ARTICLE III
BILL OF RIGHTS
Section 3.
(1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law.
(2) Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding.
Section 4.
No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.
The Supreme Court issued the temporary restraining order (TRO) against the implementation of Republic Act 10175,..
This page challenges this church or any people (Politicians or non politicians and any other religious Personalities also media personalities) who are opposing the bill to an open debate and even arguments in this page.. And let the people see.. If not, then there's no reason to do not pass this bill..
You can Donate to this Personal acct..
BPI (Bank of the Philippine Island) Easy Saver
Express Teller
0989-2098-25
We are not only dealing with this so called values of them (This one particular Church- RCC) and culture that always been alibi by Catholics (A culture that was being force to us to embrace for 300 years by those who invaded us..) and some so called Christian Denominations that always avail just for their own purposes, But were dealing of different cultures and not just one believe, and the needs of all the people here in this Nation.. This Bill is not new in our land -
"Historically, divorce had been part of our legal system. In the beginning of the 16th century, before the Spanish colonial rule, absolute divorce waswidely practiced among ancestral tribes such as the Tagbanwas of Palawan,the Gadangs of Nueva Vizcaya, the Sagadans and Igorots of the Cordilleras,and the Manobos, B’laans and Moslems of the Visayas and Mindanao islands.Divorce was also available during the American period, starting from 1917(under Act No. 2710 enacted by the Philippine Legislature), and during the Japanese occupation (under Executive Order No. 141) and after, until 1950. Itwas only on August 30, 1950, when the New Civil Code took effect, thatdivorce was disallowed under Philippine law. Only legal separation wasavailable. The same rule was adopted by the Family Code of 1988, whichreplaced the provisions of the New Civil Code on marriage and the family,although the Family Code introduced the concept of "psychologicalincapacity” as a basis for declaring the marriage void" Source - http://www.scribd.com/doc/35768034/GABRIELA-PARTY-LIST-S-HB-1799-Divorce-Bill
This kind of hypocrisy hides the reality of whats really happening between the married couples that jeopardized their lives. And also hides the reality of most of people here are ending up in separation. They don't want a formal total separation but instead still bounding those persons in a lie, complicated annulment law (adultery bill).. This lies of Church calling themselves advocate of morality must realize the reality that people whose not in their religion are not bound on such filthy doctrines. If they believe what they believe then why force it to others... They just making fool out of this people..
("Because Filipinos are primarily a Catholic country and divorce is not allowed by the Church that is why families are regarded with so much love and care in the Philippines.." source-http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080714055400AAG3K7e ) Note: Divorce is not allowed by the Church..
The Constitution of the Philippines :
"The Separation of Church and State shall be " inviolable" (Not capable of being broken or violated) .-Art II. Section 6, 1987 Constitution No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of political rights.-Art. III, Section 5, 1987 Constitution Religious denominations and sects shall not be
registered (as a political party,organization or coalition, by the Comelec)-Art. IX, C, Section 2(5)One-half of the seats allocated to the party-list representatives shall be filled, as provided by law, by selection or election from labor, peasant, urban poor,indigenous cultural communities, women, youth, and such other sectors as may be provided by law, except the religious sector.-Art. VI, sec. 5(2)." - Source - Philippine Constitution (Present Constitution)
1973 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines - Section 8. No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.
Title IIIRELIGION Article 5. The State recognizes the freedom and equality of all religions, as well as the separation of the Church and the State. - 1899 Constitution
Title III RELIGION Article 5. The State recognizes the freedom and equality of all religions, as well as the
separation of the Church and the State. - Malolos Constituition
-The family code of the Philippines does not forbid divorce, It is just not mentioned and not prioritize the literal word divorce, it just need to be amend.. In the family code all the reason to pass the bill (divorce) are in the articles.. They knew time will come that this bill will be debated and this country should have Divorce.. The term legal Separation is Divorce..
"In recognition of the history of divorce in the Philippines, the framers of the 1987 Philippine Constitution left the wisdom of legalizing divorce to the Congress. Thus, the 1987 Constitution does not prohibit the legalization of divorce." Source- http://www.scribd.com/doc/35768034/GABRIELA-PARTY-LIST-S-HB-1799-Divorce-Bill
These so called morality of these church that are being used by these congressman and senators and all these holy pretender religious people here in the Philippines that holding this bill to do not pass it are just only lies
and hypocrisy.. They always alibi the scriptures but they did not understand because they always follow what had been told to them by their priests whose not even know the hole scriptures.. To all lawyers and law makers in the Philippines, Let these be a clarification to pass the important bill and to justify the said bill that this country should have, and the rights of all women to go and marry another man and the rights of man to marry another woman with no complicated separation and no legal lies involved (Annulment Law)-
"annulment is proving that the marriage wasn't real or legal due to different factors therefore making the marriage non-existent or invalid."
Source- http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080714055400AAG3K7e
“In annulment, the marriage of the parties is declared defective from the beginning, albeit it's considered valid until annulled. The defect can be used to nullify the marriage within a specified period but the same may be ignored and the marriage becomes perfectly valid after the lapse of that period, or the defect may be cured through some act. The defect relates to the time of the celebration of the marriage and has nothing to do with circumstances occurring after the marriage is celebrated. In annulment, the marriage is legally canceled, and the man and woman are restored to their singles status.”
Source - http://attyatwork.com/house-bill-1699-proposing-divorce-in-the-philippines/
This Annulment Law complicates and burden the people in this country.. They legalizes lies ..-
“I’ll tell you why. I’ve talked to lawyers, psychologists and psychiatrists and it’s so traumatic to go through annulment because under our Philippine laws, you have to blame someone, you have to say you’re incapacitated, you’re saying that this marriage never existed, which is not true,” she said.
“Ask anyone, I’m sure at some point in time whether it’s one year or 10 years or 20 years, they loved each other, so why can’t you call it what it is? We loved each other, something went wrong, it’s done. Why will you say it never existed?” she asked. - a Senator speaking..
Source- http://globalbalita.com/2012/05/29/philippines-needs-divorce-law/
"The problem with annulment of voidable marriage and declaration of nullity of marriage is that most of the grounds are difficult to prove and require a lot of money to prove before the court. Only the rich can and have actually availed of its benefits, that’s why it’s not unusual to read about movie and TV celebrities and businessmen filing for annulment of marriage, and why only 8,000 annulments have been issued so far. And worse, it is the aggrieved party who must shoulder the exorbitant costs."
Source- http://globalbalita.com/2012/05/29/philippines-needs-divorce-law/
This is not a evangelical page or a pastor of scripture but let this be a clarification to the false teachings that was force to every people here in this country that for decades that are being fooled to this land and to justified the said important bill (Divorce Bill).. These scriptures are what they stand for, and their reason to do not pass the said bill (Divorce Bill) but what does the Church stand when it comes to the scripture?
"The Bible does not pretend to be a formulary of belief, as in a creed or catechism. There is nowhere in the New Testament a clear, methodical statement of the teaching of Christ" -Question Box, p. 66
"The very nature of the Bible ought to prove to any thinking man the impossibility of its being the one safe method to find out what the Savior taught." Ibid., p. 67
"Again it has ever been practically impossible for men, generally, to find out Christ from the Bible only." -Question Box, p. 70
"The Scriptures indeed is a divine book but it is a dead letter, which has to be explained, and cannot exercise the action which the preacher can obtain." -Our Priesthood, p. 155
"Again it has ever been practically impossible for men, generally, to find out Christ from the Bible only." -Question Box, p. 70
"The simple fact is that the Bible, like all dead letters, calls for a living interpreter." -The Faith of Millions, p. 155
"Again it has ever been practically impossible for men, generally, to find out Christ from the Bible only." -
Question Box, p. 70
"The Bible was not intended to be a textbook of Christian religion." -Catholic Facts, p. 50
"The simple fact is that the Bible, like all dead letters, calls for a living interpreter." -The Faith of Millions, p. 155
The forcing these kind of belief to the people that bonds them by the use of the source that they despised and despite.. Now what are the scriptures that they are trying to use to bond the people, What does the scripture said? - The Answer follows
1 Corinthians 7:10-11 KJV "10 And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:
11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife."
-No man should separate them for they are faithful to each other..
Matthew 19:6 KJV "Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."
-But if they (The married couple) decided and choose to separate to each other for reasons, then let no man stop them..
Rom. 7:2–3 KJV "For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband."
-A married woman is bound by law to her husband as long as he lives, but if they are legally separated she is not bound anymore..
1 Corinthians 7:15 KJV "But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace."
-Don't bound the unbeliever is such believe that she or he does not even believe that may cause unpeacefull end..
Matthew 19:8 KJV "He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so."
-God never gave man heart that will kill( not literal) his wife because of unfaithful relationship or any other reasons..
Mark 10:11-12 KJV
11 And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.
Mark 5:31 KJV "It has been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:"
-The words "put away" and "divorcement" are placed in one sentence, it means they are opposite and not the same.. How can these words are the same if they are used to separate a subject.. How can Christ said that if he put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her, and commanded Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement..
For more clarification - "Jesus did not say that whosoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery. What He did say was that whosoever marries a woman that has been separated from her husband without a legal bill of divorcement commits adultery; because she is still legally and officially married to her estranged husband." source http://www.lifetv.org/Web_HTML/html/Commentary%20folder/Divorce.htm
-"The phrase “putting away” is not the Hebrew word “keriythuwth” (divorce) but rather it is translated from the Hebrew word that represents the second component of a Biblical divorce, “shalach” (to put out, to send away). The King James Bible correctly translated the Hebrew passage with the words, God hates “the putting away” of a wife.." -see source- http://www.lifetv.org/Web_HTML/html/Commentary%20folder/Divorce.htm
Deuteronomy 24 KJV "When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house."
-God considered and allowed divorce
John 3:18 KJV
"18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."
Deuteronomy 24:22 KJV "And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt: therefore I command thee to do this thing."
Note: King James Version is the scripture that only translated word for word and preserved during the time of persecution by the Catholic Church of this Book (The Bible) and burn all of it and replaced it with their own version (Catholic Version) that leads to many misinterpreted versions of this scriptures....
Revelation 22- KJV
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
The doctrines of the church is a plague in this country..
Is the Church (RCC) Using God's Law or their own made doctrines (Invented Religious Law).. Its unbiblical..
This fascists (Priest, Bishops, Nuns, Pope) of this church and their dominion inside the Government and other religious leaders always advocating about morality.. But they are the poison to the society..
-Matthew 23:25-33 King James Version (KJV)
25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.
26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.
27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.
28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
Bishop accused of diverting millions - http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/7201-church-fund-misuse-to-be-probed-by-rome
Facing the Senate on the alleged use of public funds to benefit some members of the Church, the bishops announced they were returning the vehicles, some of which were parked on the Senate grounds.- http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/1419-calling-on-the-suv-bishops#.T0TK1gOykyE.facebook
Priest charged with adultery, unjust vexation-"ANGELES CITY, Philippines – A mall executive has filed adultery and unjust vexation charges on Friday against a newly ordained priest, whom he accused of having an illicit affair with his wife." - http://www.philstar.com/nation/article.aspx?publicationsubcategoryid=67&articleid=737761
A ROMAN Catholic Filipino priest, who is believed to be hiding in the Philippines after being accused of possessing child pornography and stealing from his parish in Worcester, Massachusetts, has been officially indicted on those charges, according to the Worcester Telegram. - http://www.asianjournal.com/fil-am-news/3-filamnews/15337-pinoy-priest-indicted-on-child-porn-charges.html
Msgr. Achilles Dakay, the archdiocese’s media liaison officer, said Garcia’s suspension came months before the priest was implicated by a National Geographic article in illegal trade of ivory in the Philippines.- http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/277960/priest-suspended-on-20-year-old-child-abuse-raps
Dakay said Garcia was suspended by Cebu Archbishop Jose Palma in June on instructions of the Vatican because of the ongoing investigation of the child abuse case filed against him.- http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/277960/priest-suspended-on-20-year-old-child-abuse-raps
"They washed their hands of him," said the other former altar boy with whom Monsignor Garcia admits having had sexual contact. "It's as if no one wants to face what happened." - Source - http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2005_03_16_Egerton_PriestAccused.htm
"The parish priest of St Anne in Tubay town, Father Raul Cabonce, is facing charges of two counts of rape, child abuse and acts of lasciviousness, filed last Thursday at the provincial prosecutor’s office." - http://www.ucanews.com/2011/08/30/diocese-looks-into-priests-rape-charge/
"Revealed: publisher owned by the Catholic Church sells pornography" - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/revealed-publisher-owned-by-the-catholic-church-sells-pornography-6257572.html
History of the Church is a full of abomination..
It is over used pathetic reasons ( Catholic Values)l to say that we must follow this kind of believe even most of the catholic people don't even follow them, and those people whose not even in their religion.. And even it contradicts its main source that they always alibi.. Were they not understand what they read and force it upon the people..
It is over reacting, over dramatic of them that saying that divorce destroys family, How can it be destroy when its already destroyed.. Traumatized children, Why blame divorce if the children was traumatized caused by never ending fighting of a couple who wants to be separated to each other.. Psychologically, it will heal these people after divorce.. They trying to put a fear in the mind of all people by meaningless and unreasonable that they can throw just to say that this bill is what it is to what they are trying to portrait by these who oppose it.. Many couples here are separated and have their new life with another spouse with no of these kind of psychological traumatized etch. thing, in fact the separation heals them. It just need their separation to be legalized with no lies involved (Annulment). They (The people who opposed it) living in a delusion like in a fairy land and They can't face the reality of most people here are needs to be formally legally separated before of having another spouse and continue their life and move on and live happily ever after..
They just creating fear into the hearts of men and women that condemns them (This People).. While their doing their (Church leaders and Religious leaders) unjust ways.. The only thing that they are doing to this people is creating a drugs to do not fear of dying and not having a life.. It doesn't matter if they die as long as the Church controls them even those whose not in their religion..
Other religion in this country have its own divorce law because of having no divorce bill here-
"Philippine law through the Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 1083 [1977]) allows divorce among Filipino Muslims, in deference to the Islamic faith which recognizes divorce. Non-Muslim Filipinos should've the same option under Philippine law, in accordance with their religious beliefs.". - Source - http://www.scribd.com/doc/35768034/GABRIELA-PARTY-LIST-S-HB-1799-Divorce-Bill
Why not pass Divorce and let others have the benefits of it..
Our Constitution does recognize the equality of all religion..It shows what kind of religion this Church is, nothing but despotism in this land. And many people here ending in a separation and having another partner without formal separation. Still this people needs a legal documentation of their separation under Republic Act (Divorce Bill). Instead of going to another country just to file a divorce, why not here. And only foreign spouses can file a divorce and not our local countrymen, it shows how this kind of maltreatment treats are local people in a slave form of situation. Making Filipino people dumb and low class being or species that are not fully develop their humanity. They shackle this people.. . Their are against the liberty of the people -
Philippines Constitution:
BILL OF RIGHTS
Section 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.
Section 11. The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights..
Section 14. The State recognizes the role of women in nation-building, and shall ensure the fundamental equality before the law of women and men.
They cannot manage their own ethics without interfering in the legislative, it shows how poor immoral they are. If their members don't want a divorce then let others have the benefits of it.. Their are not forcing to this bill (Divorce) and force to this bill, if this bill will be passed.. If they say that their values are good, then while go to attorney and file a divorce. That's their choice, live in a complicated annulment form of separation and live together with their wife and husband in hell until someone die in their part to get free, but don't let others be on the same situation inside this religion.. Whats a Democracy without divorce.. Let the People choose.. This kind of religion will always seek for a civil authority for all to the people be obligated to their own religious law.. This country is not a Theocracy..
Are all people are bound to this Church? It is not a problem of a person who do not believe in their doctrines to follow it and bound him or herself unto it.. Even the bible contradicts their filthy doctrines (RCC doctrines). What about those Unbelievers? or other religion who believe in divorce? and majority of the people in this Country are favoring divorce. Majority or Minority of people living in this country are equal when it comes of giving their rights reasonable and responsible. Are these people are bound and obligated to the rules of this Church (RCC)? If they say that the basis of their doctrines is the bible then what they are doing in their church.. Again this question needs to be answered by this persons who's in placed and all people who against the right of men and women of having this benefits, Are all people here in this Republic are obligate and must follow your religious doctrines? Are all people here must be under the Church law?
You only giving them two options in this Republic, and that is to follow your own unjust rules which is Unconstitutional that caused animosity and may lead to hostility, and Freedom to be free from this kind of intolerant arrogant rules which does not recognize by our Constitution and have their rights of all the people as a full citizens in this Nation..
It is hard to pass a law that people will benefits but it is easy to pass one when it comes of protecting someones ass mostly whose in position and some religious domain even it is not debated and deliberated, And passed it not knowing by the people..
September 12, 2012. a Law was passed:
Republic Act 10175 or known as Cyber Crime Law
Supported by the Church
This Law is idea of what was being proposed by US and Vatican Attempting to Censor Internet..
But what the Constitution said:
(Present Constitution)
THE 1987 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
ARTICLE III
BILL OF RIGHTS
Section 3.
(1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law.
(2) Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding.
Section 4.
No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.
The Supreme Court issued the temporary restraining order (TRO) against the implementation of Republic Act 10175,..
This page challenges this church or any people (Politicians or non politicians and any other religious Personalities also media personalities) who are opposing the bill to an open debate and even arguments in this page.. And let the people see.. If not, then there's no reason to do not pass this bill..
" Hindi masama humanga sa kapwa at higit na paunlarin ang kamalayan at katalinuhan, nagiging masama lamang ito kung nagpapanggap lamang ito bilang dios at ginagamit ang kapangyarihang iyon sa pang aalipin ng ibang tao upang sumunod ito sa mga gusto nila na hindi naman tama at makatarungan.."
- Jose P. Rizal
You can Donate to this Personal acct..
BPI (Bank of the Philippine Island) Easy Saver
Express Teller
0989-2098-25
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento